ACCA:P5考官文章2010年6月

来源: 高顿网校 2013-04-19

  ACCA是财会界权威的国际会计师组织,在全球160多个国家拥有30万会员,取得ACCA资质证书可以获得英国名校硕士学位、移民资格以及国际财会界的通行证,*6年薪已逾百万元,为众多的跨国公司和国际四大会计师事务所所推崇。

  General Comments

  Firstly,I would like to offer my congratulations to all of those candidates who achieved a pass at this diet and my commiserations to those who did not.

  The examination paper comprised two sections,A and B. Section A consisted of two compulsory questions for 60 marks in total. Section B consisted of three optional questions for 20 marks each from which candidates were required to answer two questions.

  It was pleasing to see a large number of candidates providing good answers to every question they attempted and consequently achieving high marks.

  Sadly,the examination revealed a large number of candidates who were either inadequately prepared for the examination or failed to read the question requirements carefully. Nevertheless it was pleasing to observe that the improved overall performance of previous diets has been maintained,where there have been few candidates scoring very low marks.

  In general,candidates are demonstrating good skill at description but are weaker on analysis. This is a lesson that has gone unlearned from previous diets. Many answers often limited themselves to basic comments on trends (e.g. in Q1 (iii)and Q5 and tended to limit their analysis to ‘this has gone up’,‘this has gone down’ etc. At the professional level,comments should be helpfully quantified where possible and the commercial implications discussed. So ‘prevention costs have increased’would be improved to ‘the prevention costs have risen by (e.g.)12% and this should yield benefits by improving production quality and so lowering future rectification costs and improving customer satisfaction.’This shows the ability to create information and interpret it for the business being analysed.

  As a further general suggestion to improve candidates’ technique,those who use the scenario to provide illustrations of their general knowledge of a topic score more efficiently and effectively than book-learned definitions supported by vague business examples.

  Specific Comments

  Question One

  The question requested a report on the use of broader performance management systems at a consultancy business (SBC)。

  In general,answers to requirement (i)were good with a number of candidates gaining maximum marks by ensuring that their example metrics were relevant to SBC. Weaker responses often lacked focus on the importance of non-financial performance indicators and a surprisingly large minority of candidates lacked basic knowledge of the balanced scorecard,which should be considered a core topic in P5. Requirement (ii) received answers of variable quality with many candidates not appreciating the importance of calculating the chargeable days which would exclude the business development work. A surprising number of candidates did not appreciate that the main purpose of business development was as a marketing activity.

  Requirement (iii)was reasonably answered but the answers could have been improved by candidates offering more in terms of commercial reasoning,for example,the key trend in the appendix was the drop in forecast activity and this was the likely driver of the changes in the company – it was less commercially realistic to be suggesting that the drop in numbers of consultants in a previously growing business was driving the drop in demand.

  Requirement (iv)was generally well answered although some candidates could have improved their answers by avoiding bullet points and demonstrating their understanding by giving fuller answers.

  There were 4 professional marks available for this question and these were given under the headings: format, introduction,conclusion,use of subheadings,professional language and clarity. A conclusion was not required as it is difficult to formulate for this diverse report but credit was given where it was reasonably attempted. Candidates should note however that a polite offer to discuss any question that the reader of the report might have at a later date does not constitute a conclusion to the report. Most fairly prepared candidates scored half of the marks available and those who had practised their professional presentation often scored all of the available marks.

  Question Two

  This question presented data on an academy (EMA)that provided teaching on the care and riding of horses.

  There were significant variations in the overall quality of candidates’ answers to this question. Most candidates offered excellent answers to part (a)on preparing a budgeted profit figure for the academy and many scored full marks. However, when this basic understanding was tested in part (b)(i)(finding an expected value) candidates struggled. Stronger candidates scored full marks on this part but many others would have benefited from a structured approach. The issue of risk and its treatment are an important feature of business decision-making and are in the syllabus and have been mentioned in technical articles. Additionally,much of (b)(i)is assumed knowledge from F5. This lack of knowledge was then reflected in answers to (b)(ii)where few candidates discussed the implication of the use of expected value in the risk appetite at EMA.

  Requirement (b)(iii)for three reasons for the national government opening a competitor academy was generally well answered although some candidates did not read the question and offered six reasons briefly discussed rather than three reasons each more comprehensively discussed.

  Question Three

  This question requested analysis of concepts surrounding the upgrading of housing stock by a local authority. Many candidates who attempted this question would have improved their answers by using the scenario of a local authority working for the benefit of the community as a base for their explanations.

  Requirement (i)regarding a value for money audit was reasonably answered although many candidates did not appreciate there are multiple principal/agent relationships in the scenario (home occupants/ LGHD; LGHD/contractors).A number of candidates did not read the requirement and offered general comment about VFM in the scenario when the relevance of a VFM audit was requested.

  Requirement (ii)was typically well done with most candidates displaying knowledge of the meaning of the 3 E’s and their application to the scenario.

  Requirement (iii)was generally poorly done with few candidates indicating clearly that the four terms relate more to services than tangible products. Some candidates understood the meaning of the four terms but did not clearly relate them to the situation at LGHD. Candidates would score high marks by giving examples of how each term affects LGHD’s situation and then providing any problems to which this would give rise.

  Question Four

  Question Four is set in a marine engineering company which is considering a change from traditional costing to activity-based costing (ABC)。

  Overall,answers to this question were mixed. The comparison of different methods of costing and performance measurement is a basic element of this paper and surprisingly,many candidates seem unprepared for part (a) (i).Better answers to this part focussed on how the two methods can produce different answers by comparing their underlying approaches. Again,candidates scored more heavily if their answer used the information in the scenario as illustrative example of the general points made about the different costing methods. Most candidates realised that there were price implications arising from the two costs but few realised the internal process implications for example in designing products.

  Requirement (a)(ii)requested two problems associated with implementation of an activity-based costing system using ‘state of the art’ IT systems. Candidates who focussed on the implementation stage and considered how it might be affected by such an IT system scored well. A few candidates cleverly took two subheadings and then discussed issues within these in order to ensure that they scored the two marks available for each problem.

  Requirement (b)related the ABC system used earlier in the question to the broader use of activity analysis in management of the company. There were effectively four parts to this question the three topics itemised plus the risks of using ABM. There was a wide spread of marks to this part with a few knowledgeable candidates scoring close to full marks but a number of weaker answers which failed to relate the general definitions of operational and strategic ABM to SFS. Many candidates did not realise that implicit value was the value which does not immediately appear in traditional performance measurement systems but nevertheless,is important in a long-term management of a successful business.

  Question Five

  The question was based around an electrical appliance manufacturer which is applying for a quality certification. The candidates were supplied with three years of forecast data to analyse.

  Part (a)required an explanation of cost targets and their relevance to the application for platinum status (the quality certification)and an analysis of forecasts of those costs for the next three years. There was some evidence of misreading the question as being about target costing rather than the more basic use of target costs in achieving this quality standard. However,candidates who took this track made relevant points and were given some credit. Those candidates who scored well did so by appreciating that these were forecast numbers and so gave an indication of the company’s plans not its history. Therefore,a good answer commented on how the increased quality costs of 2011 fed through to improved quality in the later years yielding lower costs. Many candidates would have benefited from considering the cost categories within each year rather than across each category. There was frequently little evidence of understanding how spending in one category affects the others – especially,the effect of conformance activity on non-conformance activity.

  Part (b)required an analysis of general forecast performance under three headings. The successful candidates made clear how their points linked to the specific headings demonstrating their appreciation of the meaning of that heading. They provided quantified analysis of the data in the appendix and linked it to business objectives under the heading. Again, the weaker candidates provided trend analysis but did not demonstrate an appreciation of how this then affected the business within the headings e.g. by satisfying customers and so being externally effective.

acca备考 热门问题解答
acca考试怎么搭配科目?

建议优先选择相关联的科目进行搭配报考,这样可以提高备考效率,减轻备考压力,1、F1-F4:为随时机考科目,难度较低,这里可以自行随意选择考试顺序。2、F5-F9:如果你的工作的和财务会计或者审计有关、或者你比较擅长财务和审计的话,推荐先考F7和F8。你可以选择一起考ACCA考试科目F7和F8或者先考F7(8)再考F8(7),这就要取决你一次想考几门。3、P阶段:选修科目中,建议企业首选AFM!第二部分科目进行选择,如果AA和SBR掌握学生更好,可以通过选择AAA,如果SBL掌握的好,可以自己选择APM。

acca一共几门几年考完?

acca一共有15门考试科目,其中有必修科目和选修科目,考生需要考完13门科目才能拿下证书。

acca一年考几次?

acca一年有4次考试,分别是3月、6月、9月和12月,分季机考科目是采取的这类四个考季的模式,而随时机考则是没有这方面的时间规定限制,可以随报随考。

acca的含金量如何?

ACCA证书的含金量是比较高的,从就业、能力提升、全球认可等角度来说,都是比较有优势的证书,其含金量主要表现在以下几个方面:1、国际化,认可度高;2、岗位多,就业前景好;3、缺口大,人才激励。

在线提问
严选名师 全流程服务

Sdanvi

高顿ACCA全学科负责人

教学特色
自创“少女三大法则”和“二阶学习法”
教学资历
两年内高分通过ACCA考试,ACCA业界学霸型讲师
客户评价
帮助学生快速理解ACCA的知识点,是ACCA学习不可错过的宝藏博主
sdanvi
  • 老师好,考出ACCA的难度相当于考进什么大学?
  • 老师好,ACCA考试怎样备考(越详细越好)?
  • 老师好,38岁才开始考ACCA会不会太迟?
  • 老师好,ACCA通过率是多少?
  • 老师好,有了ACCA证后好找工作吗?
999+人提问

Perry

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
复旦-麻省理工国际工商管理硕士
教学资历
曾就职于四大、世界500强
客户评价
ACCA业界学霸型讲师
Perry
  • 老师好,acca如果不去考会怎么样?
  • 老师好,acca难度有多大?
  • 老师好,acca一年可以考多少门?
  • 老师好,acca考试科目几年考完?
  • 老师好,acca工资一般是多少钱?
999+人提问

Dora

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
英国布里斯托优秀硕士生
教学资历
多年普华永道金融组审计师经验
客户评价
知性又美丽,温柔大姐姐
Dora
  • 老师好,acca持证工资待遇如何?
  • 老师好,35岁考acca有意义吗?
  • 老师好,考过acca能干嘛?
  • 老师好,考完acca可以做什么工作?
  • 老师好,acca年薪一般多少?
999+人提问

高顿教育 > ACCA > 考试动态