ACCA考试《审计与认证业务F8》知识辅导8
来源:
高顿网校
2015-03-19
理想是力量的泉源、智慧的摇篮、冲锋的战旗、斩棘的利剑。高顿网校为广大学员提供2015年ACCA考试网络课程,为您的理想插上翅膀,让您2015年考试顺利通过!免费听课》
RELEVANT TO ACCA QUALIFICATION PAPERS F8 AND P7
2011 ACCA
Clarity auditing standards
To enhance the application of auditing standards in exam questions,
candidates must familiarise themselves with the clarity auditing standards.
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has
completed its comprehensive project to enhance the clarity of all of its
International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) in 2009 for improving
understandability of auditing standards, and all the new clarity auditing
standards are now examinable. This also affects the Hong Kong Standards on
Auditing (HKSAs)。
The full set of clarity auditing standards features 39 documents, which include:
? a new International/Hong Kong Standard on Auditing on communicating
deficiencies in internal control – ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), Communicating
Deficiencies in Internal Control to those Charged with Governance and
Management
? 35 clarity ISAs/HKSAs
? a clarified international/Hong Kong standard on quality control – ISQC 1/
HKSQC 1, Quality Controls for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of
Financial Statements, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements
? a revised glossary of terms
? a revised preface to the International/Hong Kong Standards on Quality
Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services.
ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), Communicating Deficiencies in Internal
Control to those Charged with Governance and Management
Among the clarified auditing standards, ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified) is a
completely new standard.
It deals with the auditor’s responsibility to communicate appropriately to those
charged with governance and management deficiencies in internal control that
the auditor has identified in an audit of financial statements.
When auditors plan for an audit, they are required to perform risk assessment
through understanding internal controls, and also test for the appropriateness
of design of internal controls and whether they are implemented. When control
reliance strategy is adopted, auditors are required to perform tests of controls
to gather audit evidence on the operating effectiveness of controls.
During both processes, auditors might identify deficiencies in internal controls.
In accordance with ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), ‘deficiency’ exists when ‘a
control is designed, implemented or operated in such a way that it is unable to
prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements in financial statements on a
timely basis; or a control necessary to prevent, or detect and correct
misstatements in the financial statements on a timely basis is missing’。 It is
equivalent to a deviation from an internal control.
2
CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
APRIL 2011
It is common in practice and in exam questions to identify and explain
deficiencies in internal control systems. An example is Question 3(b) of Paper
F8 in the June 2010 exam session. Candidates were required to identify and
explain deficiencies in the cash cycle of a window cleaning company, suggest
controls to address each of these deficiencies, and list tests of controls the
auditor would perform to assess if the controls were operating effectively.
If the deficiency is significant, it is known as ‘significant deficiency’。 It is ‘a
deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control that, in the
auditor’s professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to merit the
attention of those charged with governance’。 It depends not only on whether a
misstatement has actually occurred, but also on the likelihood that a
misstatement could occur and the potential magnitude of the misstatement.
Significant deficiencies may therefore exist even though the auditor has not
identified misstatements during the audit.
Consideration points should include:
? the likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material misstatements in the
financial statements in the future
? the susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability
? the subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated amounts, such as
fair value accounting estimates
? the financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies
? the volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the account
balance or class of transactions exposed to the deficiency or deficiencies
? the importance of the controls to the financial reporting process
? the cause and frequency of the exceptions detected as a result of the
deficiencies in the controls
? the interaction of the deficiency with other deficiencies in internal control.
When you found the following indicators in real practice or exam questions,
this would indicate significant deficiencies. These include:
? evidence of ineffective aspects of the control environment, such as
management fraud not mitigated by internal controls, not sufficient
oversight of significant management interests by those charged with
governance, and no implementation of remedial actions against significant
deficiencies communicated
? absence or inefficiency of a risk assessment process
? evidence of ineffective responses to identified significant risks
? misstatements detected by the auditor’s procedures, which were not
prevented, detected and corrected by the internal controls
? restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the
correction of a material misstatement due to error or fraud
? evidence of management’s inability to oversee the preparation of the
financial statements. 3
CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
APRIL 2011
In response to significant deficiencies in internal control identified during the
audit, the auditor will communicate in writing the significant deficiencies to
those charged with governance on a timely basis. For the communication, this
would include a description of the deficiencies, an explanation of their potential
effects, and sufficient information to enable those charged with governance
and management to understand the context of the communication.
In terms of the sufficiency of the details of communication, the consideration
factors include:
? the nature of the entity – more details for public interest entities than
non-public interest entities
? the size and complexity of the entity – more details for larger and more
complex entities
? the nature of significant deficiencies that the auditor has identified – more
details for those involving integrity of management and fraud
? the entity’s governance composition – more details for inexperienced
governance members
? legal or regulatory requirements regarding the communication of specific
types of deficiency in internal control
Evaluation of misstatements
As well as deficiencies in internal controls, misstatements may also be
detected during an audit. ISA/HKSA 450 (Clarified), Evaluation of Misstatements
Identified During the Audit is actually a new separate standard as well. This
highlights the importance of focusing on the deficiencies/misstatements
during the audit, which is a common consideration for a risk-based approach.
ISA/HKSA 450 (Clarified) deals with the auditor’s responsibility to evaluate the
effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected
misstatements, if any, on the financial statements. ‘Misstatement’ is defined
as ‘a difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure
of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification,
presentation, or disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework. Misstatement can arise from
error or fraud.’ This also relates to those that require adjustments for issuing a
true and fair view on the financial statements.
For these kind of identified misstatements, the auditor should determine
whether the nature and the circumstances of their occurrence indicate the
existence of other misstatements, which could be material individually or in
aggregate. These misstatements should be communicated to the appropriate
level of management on a timely basis.
The auditor should also consider whether there is a need to revise the audit
strategy and audit plan – especially when those areas are confirmed to have
appropriate design, implementation and effective operation of controls, now
there are identified misstatements. Does the initial conclusion need to be
4
CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
APRIL 2011
reconsidered? This would definitely affect the risk assessment, audit strategy
and audit plan.
‘Uncorrected misstatements’ are the ‘misstatements that the auditor has
accumulated during the audit that have not been corrected’。 Before evaluating
the effect of the uncorrected misstatements, the auditor should confirm
whether the materiality still remains appropriate. Afterwards, the auditor will
determine the uncorrected misstatements are material individually or in
aggregate. The auditor will consider:
? the size and nature of the misstatements, and the particular circumstances
of the occurrence
? the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to the prior periods.
The auditor will communicate the uncorrected misstatements and their
implication on the auditor’s report to those charged with governance. The
auditor will also request a written representation (including a summary of
uncorrected misstatements) from management and – where appropriate –
those charged with governance as to whether they believe the effects of
uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, individually and in aggregate to the
financial statements as a whole.
Conclusion
To summarise, candidates need to update their auditing knowledge,
understand them and apply them in the exam questions.
As stated by the Paper P7 examiner: ‘A significant proportion of candidates
continue to produce answers that are simply too vague or too brief, do not
actually answer the question requirements, and display inadequate technical
knowledge of the clarified ISAs (HKSAs)。 These candidates are encouraged to
improve their exam technique, as well as knowledge of the syllabus, by
practising as many past exam questions as possible, using up-to-date study
materials, and by taking on board the comments made in examiner’s articles
and reports.’
Allan Lee FCCA is director of Allan Lee Professional Solutions Ltd and cochairman
of ACCA Hong Kong’s Student Affairs Subcommittee
This article was originally written for ACCA Hong Kong Student News Update
magazine, Winter 2010 issue but is still relevant for all auditing students.
小编寄语:成功与不成功之间有时距离很短——只要后者再向前几步。
ACCA网络课程 | 课程专业名称 | 讲师 | 试听 |
85%的人正在学习该课程 | ACCA 全维度网课体验课程 实景课堂与独立录制 覆盖所有知识点,根据学习计划推进学习进度 | 高顿名师 | |
70%的人正在学习该课程 | ACCA网课全科卡(8.2折) 为零基础刚开始学习ACCA的学员特别定制 | 高顿名师 |
精彩推荐:
版权声明:本条内容自发布之日起,有效期为一个月。凡本网站注明“来源高顿教育”或“来源高顿网校”或“来源高顿”的所有作品,均为本网站合法拥有版权的作品,未经本网站授权,任何媒体、网站、个人不得转载、链接、转帖或以其他方式使用。
经本网站合法授权的,应在授权范围内使用,且使用时必须注明“来源高顿教育”或“来源高顿网校”或“来源高顿”,并不得对作品中出现的“高顿”字样进行删减、替换等。违反上述声明者,本网站将依法追究其法律责任。
本网站的部分资料转载自互联网,均尽力标明作者和出处。本网站转载的目的在于传递更多信息,并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其描述,本网站不对其真实性负责。
如您认为本网站刊载作品涉及版权等问题,请与本网站联系(邮箱fawu@gaodun.com,电话:021-31587497),本网站核实确认后会尽快予以处理。
点一下领资料
【整理版】ACCA各科目历年真题
真题高频考点,刷题全靠这份资料
下载合集
acca全科学习思维导图
梳理核心考点,一图看懂全部章节
下载合集
2023年acca考纲解析
覆盖科目重难点,备考按照计划走
下载合集
acca备考 热门问题解答
- acca考试怎么搭配科目?
-
建议优先选择相关联的科目进行搭配报考,这样可以提高备考效率,减轻备考压力,1、F1-F4:为随时机考科目,难度较低,这里可以自行随意选择考试顺序。2、F5-F9:如果你的工作的和财务会计或者审计有关、或者你比较擅长财务和审计的话,推荐先考F7和F8。你可以选择一起考ACCA考试科目F7和F8或者先考F7(8)再考F8(7),这就要取决你一次想考几门。3、P阶段:选修科目中,建议企业首选AFM!第二部分科目进行选择,如果AA和SBR掌握学生更好,可以通过选择AAA,如果SBL掌握的好,可以自己选择APM。
- acca一共几门几年考完?
-
acca一共有15门考试科目,其中有必修科目和选修科目,考生需要考完13门科目才能拿下证书。
- acca一年考几次?
-
acca一年有4次考试,分别是3月、6月、9月和12月,分季机考科目是采取的这类四个考季的模式,而随时机考则是没有这方面的时间规定限制,可以随报随考。
- acca的含金量如何?
-
ACCA证书的含金量是比较高的,从就业、能力提升、全球认可等角度来说,都是比较有优势的证书,其含金量主要表现在以下几个方面:1、国际化,认可度高;2、岗位多,就业前景好;3、缺口大,人才激励。
严选名师 全流程服务
其他人还搜了
热门推荐
-
盐城ACCA培训机构,高顿ACCA要不要报? 2023-07-04
-
绵阳ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA值得报吗? 2023-07-04
-
莆田ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA要不要报? 2023-07-03
-
昆山ACCA培训班,高顿ACCA培训介绍? 2023-07-03
-
会计专业有哪些证书大学可以考?证书报考条件及获取指南一览! 2023-07-03
-
会计专业acca方向是学什么的? 2023-07-03
-
银川ACCA培训机构,高顿ACCA有哪些优势? 2023-07-03
-
襄阳ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA值得报吗? 2023-07-03
-
南通ACCA培训介绍,高顿ACCA课程如何? 2023-07-03
-
鞍山ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA推荐吗? 2023-07-03
-
西宁ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA有哪些优势? 2023-06-26
-
江门ACCA培训机构,高顿ACCA好不好? 2023-06-26
-
赣州ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA推荐吗? 2023-06-26
-
廊坊ACCA培训班,高顿ACCA值得报名吗? 2023-06-25
-
大同ACCA培训介绍,高顿ACCA课程如何? 2023-06-25
-
大同ACCA培训介绍,高顿ACCA课程如何? 2023-06-25
-
保定ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA培训介绍? 2023-06-25
-
珠海ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA要不要报? 2023-06-25
-
邯郸ACCA培训介绍,高顿ACCA怎么样? 2023-06-25
-
包头ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA课程如何? 2023-06-25
-
烟台ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA课程怎么样? 2023-06-25
-
洛阳ACCA培训班,高顿ACCA值得报名吗? 2023-06-25
-
徐州ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA怎么样? 2023-06-21
-
唐山ACCA培训介绍,高顿ACCA要不要报? 2023-06-21
-
绍兴ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA推荐吗? 2023-06-21
-
柳州ACCA培训班,高顿ACCA好不好? 2023-06-21
-
呼和浩特ACCA培训机构,高顿ACCA培训介绍? 2023-06-21
-
海口ACCA培训推荐,高顿ACCA怎么样? 2023-06-21
-
温州ACCA培训课程,高顿ACCA怎么样? 2023-06-21
-
淄博ACCA培训机构,高顿ACCA好不好? 2023-06-21