ACCA考试《P3商务分析》知识辅导3

来源: 高顿网校 2015-03-19
  理想是力量的泉源、智慧的摇篮、冲锋的战旗、斩棘的利剑。高顿网校为广大学员提供2015年ACCA考试网络课程,为您的理想插上翅膀,让您2015年考试顺利通过!免费听课》
  RELEVANT TO ACCA QUALIFICATION PAPERS F8 AND P7
  2011 ACCA
  Clarity auditing standards
  To enhance the application of auditing standards in exam questions,
  candidates must familiarise themselves with the clarity auditing standards.
  The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has
  completed its comprehensive project to enhance the clarity of all of its
  International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) in 2009 for improving
  understandability of auditing standards, and all the new clarity auditing
  standards are now examinable. This also affects the Hong Kong Standards on
  Auditing (HKSAs)。
  The full set of clarity auditing standards features 39 documents, which include:
   a new International/Hong Kong Standard on Auditing on communicating
  deficiencies in internal control – ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), Communicating
  Deficiencies in Internal Control to those Charged with Governance and
  Management
   35 clarity ISAs/HKSAs
   a clarified international/Hong Kong standard on quality control – ISQC 1/
  HKSQC 1, Quality Controls for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of
  Financial Statements, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements
  a revised glossary of terms
   a revised preface to the International/Hong Kong Standards on Quality
  Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services.
  ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), Communicating Deficiencies in Internal
  Control to those Charged with Governance and Management
  Among the clarified auditing standards, ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified) is a
  completely new standard.
  It deals with the auditor’s responsibility to communicate appropriately to those
  charged with governance and management deficiencies in internal control that
  the auditor has identified in an audit of financial statements.
  When auditors plan for an audit, they are required to perform risk assessment
  through understanding internal controls, and also test for the appropriateness
  of design of internal controls and whether they are implemented. When control
  reliance strategy is adopted, auditors are required to perform tests of controls
  to gather audit evidence on the operating effectiveness of controls.
  During both processes, auditors might identify deficiencies in internal controls.
  In accordance with ISA/HKSA 265 (Clarified), ‘deficiency’ exists when ‘a
  control is designed, implemented or operated in such a way that it is unable to
  prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements in financial statements on a
  timely basis; or a control necessary to prevent, or detect and correct
  misstatements in the financial statements on a timely basis is missing’。 It is
  equivalent to a deviation from an internal control.
  2
  CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
  APRIL 2011
  It is common in practice and in exam questions to identify and explain
  deficiencies in internal control systems. An example is Question 3(b) of Paper
  F8 in the June 2010 exam session. Candidates were required to identify and
  explain deficiencies in the cash cycle of a window cleaning company, suggest
  controls to address each of these deficiencies, and list tests of controls the
  auditor would perform to assess if the controls were operating effectively.
  If the deficiency is significant, it is known as ‘significant deficiency’。 It is ‘a
  deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control that, in the
  auditor’s professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to merit the
  attention of those charged with governance’。 It depends not only on whether a
  misstatement has actually occurred, but also on the likelihood that a
  misstatement could occur and the potential magnitude of the misstatement.
  Significant deficiencies may therefore exist even though the auditor has not
  identified misstatements during the audit.
  Consideration points should include:
   the likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material misstatements in the
  financial statements in the future
   the susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or liability
  the subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated amounts, such as
  fair value accounting estimates
  the financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies
   the volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the account
  balance or class of transactions exposed to the deficiency or deficiencies
   the importance of the controls to the financial reporting process
   the cause and frequency of the exceptions detected as a result of the
  deficiencies in the controls
   the interaction of the deficiency with other deficiencies in internal control.
  When you found the following indicators in real practice or exam questions,
  this would indicate significant deficiencies. These include:
   evidence of ineffective aspects of the control environment, such as
  management fraud not mitigated by internal controls, not sufficient
  oversight of significant management interests by those charged with
  governance, and no implementation of remedial actions against significant
  deficiencies communicated
   absence or inefficiency of a risk assessment process
   evidence of ineffective responses to identified significant risks
   misstatements detected by the auditor’s procedures, which were not
  prevented, detected and corrected by the internal controls
   restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the
  correction of a material misstatement due to error or fraud
  evidence of management’s inability to oversee the preparation of the
  financial statements.  3
  CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
  APRIL 2011
  In response to significant deficiencies in internal control identified during the
  audit, the auditor will communicate in writing the significant deficiencies to
  those charged with governance on a timely basis. For the communication, this
  would include a description of the deficiencies, an explanation of their potential
  effects, and sufficient information to enable those charged with governance
  and management to understand the context of the communication.
  In terms of the sufficiency of the details of communication, the consideration
  factors include:
  the nature of the entity – more details for public interest entities than
  non-public interest entities
  the size and complexity of the entity – more details for larger and more
  complex entities
  the nature of significant deficiencies that the auditor has identified – more
  details for those involving integrity of management and fraud
    the entity’s governance composition – more details for inexperienced
  governance members
   legal or regulatory requirements regarding the communication of specific
  types of deficiency in internal control
  Evaluation of misstatements
  As well as deficiencies in internal controls, misstatements may also be
  detected during an audit. ISA/HKSA 450 (Clarified), Evaluation of Misstatements
  Identified During the Audit is actually a new separate standard as well. This
  highlights the importance of focusing on the deficiencies/misstatements
  during the audit, which is a common consideration for a risk-based approach.
  ISA/HKSA 450 (Clarified) deals with the auditor’s responsibility to evaluate the
  effect of identified misstatements on the audit and of uncorrected
  misstatements, if any, on the financial statements. ‘Misstatement’ is defined
  as ‘a difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure
  of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification,
  presentation, or disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance
  with the applicable financial reporting framework. Misstatement can arise from
  error or fraud.’ This also relates to those that require adjustments for issuing a
  true and fair view on the financial statements.
  For these kind of identified misstatements, the auditor should determine
  whether the nature and the circumstances of their occurrence indicate the
  existence of other misstatements, which could be material individually or in
  aggregate. These misstatements should be communicated to the appropriate
  level of management on a timely basis.
  The auditor should also consider whether there is a need to revise the audit
  strategy and audit plan – especially when those areas are confirmed to have
  appropriate design, implementation and effective operation of controls, now
  there are identified misstatements. Does the initial conclusion need to be
  4
  CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS
  APRIL 2011
  reconsidered? This would definitely affect the risk assessment, audit strategy
  and audit plan.
  ‘Uncorrected misstatements’ are the ‘misstatements that the auditor has
  accumulated during the audit that have not been corrected’。 Before evaluating
  the effect of the uncorrected misstatements, the auditor should confirm
  whether the materiality still remains appropriate. Afterwards, the auditor will
  determine the uncorrected misstatements are material individually or in
  aggregate. The auditor will consider:
   the size and nature of the misstatements, and the particular circumstances
  of the occurrence
   the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to the prior periods.
  The auditor will communicate the uncorrected misstatements and their
  implication on the auditor’s report to those charged with governance. The
  auditor will also request a written representation (including a summary of
  uncorrected misstatements) from management and – where appropriate –
  those charged with governance as to whether they believe the effects of
  uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, individually and in aggregate to the
  financial statements as a whole.
  Conclusion
  To summarise, candidates need to update their auditing knowledge,
  understand them and apply them in the exam questions.
  As stated by the Paper P7 examiner: ‘A significant proportion of candidates
  continue to produce answers that are simply too vague or too brief, do not
  actually answer the question requirements, and display inadequate technical
  knowledge of the clarified ISAs (HKSAs)。 These candidates are encouraged to
  improve their exam technique, as well as knowledge of the syllabus, by
  practising as many past exam questions as possible, using up-to-date study
  materials, and by taking on board the comments made in examiner’s articles
  and reports.’
  Allan Lee FCCA is director of Allan Lee Professional Solutions Ltd and cochairman
  of ACCA Hong Kong’s Student Affairs Subcommittee
  This article was originally written for ACCA Hong Kong Student News Update
  magazine, Winter 2010 issue but is still relevant for all auditing students.
  小编寄语:成功与不成功之间有时距离很短——只要后者再向前几步。
ACCA网络课程课程专业名称讲师试听
85%的人正在学习该课程ACCA 全维度网课体验课程
实景课堂与独立录制
覆盖所有知识点,根据学习计划推进学习进度
高顿名师
70%的人正在学习该课程ACCA网课全科卡(8.2折)
为零基础刚开始学习ACCA的学员特别定制
高顿名师

acca备考 热门问题解答
acca考试怎么搭配科目?

建议优先选择相关联的科目进行搭配报考,这样可以提高备考效率,减轻备考压力,1、F1-F4:为随时机考科目,难度较低,这里可以自行随意选择考试顺序。2、F5-F9:如果你的工作的和财务会计或者审计有关、或者你比较擅长财务和审计的话,推荐先考F7和F8。你可以选择一起考ACCA考试科目F7和F8或者先考F7(8)再考F8(7),这就要取决你一次想考几门。3、P阶段:选修科目中,建议企业首选AFM!第二部分科目进行选择,如果AA和SBR掌握学生更好,可以通过选择AAA,如果SBL掌握的好,可以自己选择APM。

acca一共几门几年考完?

acca一共有15门考试科目,其中有必修科目和选修科目,考生需要考完13门科目才能拿下证书。

acca一年考几次?

acca一年有4次考试,分别是3月、6月、9月和12月,分季机考科目是采取的这类四个考季的模式,而随时机考则是没有这方面的时间规定限制,可以随报随考。

acca的含金量如何?

ACCA证书的含金量是比较高的,从就业、能力提升、全球认可等角度来说,都是比较有优势的证书,其含金量主要表现在以下几个方面:1、国际化,认可度高;2、岗位多,就业前景好;3、缺口大,人才激励。

在线提问
严选名师 全流程服务

Sdanvi

高顿ACCA全学科负责人

教学特色
自创“少女三大法则”和“二阶学习法”
教学资历
两年内高分通过ACCA考试,ACCA业界学霸型讲师
客户评价
帮助学生快速理解ACCA的知识点,是ACCA学习不可错过的宝藏博主
sdanvi
  • 老师好,考出ACCA的难度相当于考进什么大学?
  • 老师好,ACCA考试怎样备考(越详细越好)?
  • 老师好,38岁才开始考ACCA会不会太迟?
  • 老师好,ACCA通过率是多少?
  • 老师好,有了ACCA证后好找工作吗?
999+人提问

Perry

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
复旦-麻省理工国际工商管理硕士
教学资历
曾就职于四大、世界500强
客户评价
ACCA业界学霸型讲师
Perry
  • 老师好,acca如果不去考会怎么样?
  • 老师好,acca难度有多大?
  • 老师好,acca一年可以考多少门?
  • 老师好,acca考试科目几年考完?
  • 老师好,acca工资一般是多少钱?
999+人提问

Dora

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
英国布里斯托优秀硕士生
教学资历
多年普华永道金融组审计师经验
客户评价
知性又美丽,温柔大姐姐
Dora
  • 老师好,acca持证工资待遇如何?
  • 老师好,35岁考acca有意义吗?
  • 老师好,考过acca能干嘛?
  • 老师好,考完acca可以做什么工作?
  • 老师好,acca年薪一般多少?
999+人提问

高顿教育 > ACCA > 考试辅导