2010年ACCA考试考官报告P5科目3

　　高顿网校小编提醒各位ACCA学员，历年考试的考官报告也是值得研究一下的哦，下面就是小编的整理啦。
        问题二提供了一家制造商的相关数据，它是生产危险环境下使用的笔记本电脑的。A部分要求考生评价传统成本法和作业成本法。考生在这个问题上的成绩有非常显著的差异。能够正确计算相关成本的考生，得分较高，因为他们能证明对这两种方法的透彻理解。B部分整体上答得都不错，即使考生经常将超预算这种方法的实施细节说得非常概略。

　　Question Two

　　This question presented data on a manufacturer (RL) that provided laptops for use in dangerous environments.

　　In part (a),candidates were asked to evaluate a traditional costing method with an activity-based one (ABC).

　　Calculations of the result of using both these methods were possible and expected.There were significant variations in the overall quality of candidates’ answers to this question.Those candidates who could correctly calculate the relevant costs scored well as they could then provide specific evidence for their recommendations about the two methods.Indeed,a good number scored 12 or more out of 15.Those that then continued the calculations to consider the main commercial implications of the two methods on the pricing at RL often scored full marks.Sadly,a number of candidates did not appear to know how to use the ABC method which should be considered a basic technique for a management accountant.

　　In part (b),candidates were asked to explain a ‘beyond budgeting’ approach and evaluate its use at RL.This part was generally well attempted although candidates often were sketchy on the details of implementation of this approach.It was pleasing to see many candidates analysing the environment for RL as competitive and innovative and applying these as criteria for judgement about whether the beyond budgeting approach suited the company.This is a good example of making the answer specific to the scenario.

　　各位考生，2015年ACCA备考已经开始，为了方便各位学员能更加系统地掌握考试大纲的重点知识，帮助大家充分备考，体验实战，高顿网校开通了全免费的ACCA题库（包括精题真题和全真模考系统），题库里附有详细的答案解析，学员可以通过多种题型加强练习。戳这里进入ACCA免费题库>>>