3月ACCA考试F4 Examiner’s report

来源: 高顿网校 2016-02-22
Examiner’s report F4 (ENG) Corporate & Business Law For Paper Variant exams December 2015
General Comments
This report is the third session of examinations carried out under the new structure. The December 2105 paper followed the structure introduced in the December 2014 examination. The paper is divided into two parts:
Section A comprised of 45 multiple choice questions (MCQs) of either 1 or 2 marks to a total of 70 marks, while Section B contains 5 multiple task questions (MTQs) each worth a total of 6 marks giving the normal overall total of 100 marks. All questions are compulsory and the exam time period is 2 hours. In the computer-based examination format, all questions are structured so as to be capable of objective marking, while in the paper based format, although section A is marked objectively by computer, section B is still marked by subject experts.
The present structure replicates division in the previous examination structure between essentially knowledge based questions and questions requiring, not merely knowledge, but analysis and application in addition.
Although the time period for the exam is only two hours, there is no evidence of candidates’ performance suffering under time pressure to complete it. Indeed it would appear that some candidates had sufficient time to copy their answers for the Section A computer marked MCQ questions on their exam papers, while others provided unnecessarily extended answers to questions in the written part of the paper exam.
Section A
As was hoped, this knowledge part of the exam appears to have benefited the majority of candidates, who traditionally have been stronger in fact based questions than in legal analysis. In examining the overall performance it can still be seen that candidates fared better in this section than in the analysis/application and there is certainly no evidence that any candidates suffered as a result of their performance in Section A as opposed to Section B.
As might be expected, the simpler 1 mark questions tended to be answered better than the more complex 2 mark questions. It has to be said, however, that there was a wide range of performance over the whole range of questions in either mark category, so it cannot be concluded that either the 1 mark question were too easy or the 2 mark questions too difficult, although the best performances were in relation to 1 mark questions and the worst in relation to the 2 mark ones.
As in previous examinations under the new structure, the extension of the field of material to be covered did not prove a major difficulty. However, it has to be admitted that candidates did show some problems in dealing with the more difficult questions in areas of the syllabus in which they have traditionally struggled. As with the previous examination, it would appear that candidates have benefited from the recognition that they will be examined over a wider spectrum of the curriculum. Whereas previously candidates engaged in topic, and even worse question, spotting now it would appear that they realise that there is nothing to be gained in such an exercise as all aspects of the syllabus can be examined in one exam.
However, it has to be recognised that the new structure requires candidates to be aware of more detailed information than perhaps was required previously. Question 12 in the current exam can be used to demonstrate this. The question was:
Which of the following may be found liable for fraudulent trading under s.213 Insolvency Act 1986?
(1) Creditors
(2) Employees
(3) Shareholders
A (3) only
B (1) and (2) only
C (1), (2) and (3)
D (2) and (3) only
(2 marks)
It has to be recognised immediately that this question is at the difficult end of the spectrum of difficulty in that it requires detailed knowledge of the law relating to fraudulent trading and is very unlikely to be amenable to guessing, or working out on the basis of an application of common sense principles. Unfortunately, on the basis of the detailed statistical analysis of candidates answers, it would appear that the majority did not possess the level of knowledge required and were forced to rely on their understanding and application of broad general principles. Following that line of reasoning may give an insight to how the question was answered by those who really did not know the answer.
At the outset it is tempting to suggest that any answer including creditors is wrong, as they are the ones most likely to suffer as a result of wrongful trading. Equally any answer including shareholders is more likely to be right as they have some, if limited, responsibility for their company. Employees would appear to be somewhere between these two possibilities, as they are actually involved in the company’s business and may even be the directors of the company. Examining the options individually:
Answer A appears distinctly plausible as the company is operated in the name of shareholders and they carry some, if limited, liability for company debts. As a distractor from the correct answer, this option worked well as it was the second most popular choice of candidates.
Answer B is the least likely as it involves both of the unlikely possibilities, unless one misapplies the doctrine of separate personality and recalls that shareholders do have limited liability. If the shareholders are not liable then the other two categories might very well be. Again the distractor worked as although it was the least often selected, a significant number of candidates elected to go for this option.
Answer C just looks wrong but is actually the correct answer. It appears that the examiner has just put everything together to make up an answer with no real discrimination, especially as it includes the clear outsider, creditors.A slightly greater number of candidates elected for this option than picked option B.
Answer D was by far the most popular choice of answer. It excluded creditors, who were outside the company,but did not just focus on shareholders but included employees, some of whom might even have been directors.Only those who were confident in their knowledge would have picked option C.
Question 20
in the current paper raises a related difficulty. Here, the question was:
In the context of the tort of negligence, the requirement of foreseeability requires which of the following?
A The type of injury to be reasonably foreseeable
B The extent of injury to be reasonably foreseeable
C The particular injury to be reasonably foreseeable
D Both the extent and type of injury to be reasonably foreseeable
(2 marks)
While the structure of this question is perhaps more simple than the previous example, it does relate to the topic area of tort law, which has a history of being inadequately answered. In addition it raises a conceptually difficult aspect within that general topic: foreseeability. Nonetheless, just as tort is an essential aspect of the syllabus, so foreseeability is an essential aspect of tort law and one that has to be examined. Once again, those who did not actually know the answer were thrown back upon their own intuition, but this time the consequence would seem to be that the ‘obvious’ but wrong answer was option D, which brought together two for the previous options. If one doesn’t know the correct answer, and all the first three options appear reasonably plausible, with option C being perhaps the least plausible then the answer that combines the two most plausible options must be the correct answer. That, at least would appear to be the reasoning based the statistical analysis of the question. The correct answer was option A, although only a minority of candidates elected for that option.
The suspicion continues that candidates may be tempted to skim read questions and answers and simply do not spend sufficient time on thinking about them. Questions are sometimes more subtle than candidates allow for.
One final comment in relation to Section A, and one that supports the above point about time management, is that very few candidates did not answer all of the questions.
Section B
This element of the examination requires both analysis and application, which skills traditionally have not been to the forefront of candidates’ abilities. Unfortunately, it has to be recognised that such weaknesses remain, even if the new structure has gone some way to mitigate the consequences. Now, scenarios are shorter, and questions are subdivided and more focussed. What the questions under the new structure seek to do is to encourage candidates to demonstrate their understanding of and ability to apply particular legal principles and concepts.
However, as with Section A, this apparent reduction in what is required, introduces a compensating difficulty, that candidates must focus on and succinctly address the issue raised by the question: irrelevant information simply will not be rewarded and it is a matter of fact that the shorter, more detailed, questions have a tendency to starkly expose any lack of knowledge or application on the part of candidates.
One unfortunate continuation is the prepared general answer to a highly specific question. Thus contract questions may begin with an exposition of offer and acceptance when the question is actually about part payment of debts.
This also supports the previous suggestion that candidates were not under any time-pressure, in the written exam papers as they had sufficient time to reproduce of extensively prepared, but mainly irrelevant, answers.
It would be unfair and inaccurate not to recognise that there has been an overall improvement in the way in which the analysis/application questions are dealt with by candidates, but there are still grounds for major improvement, especially, if not specifically, in relation to the written paper.
Another unfortunate practice from the previous structure, which continues to appear in the written paper, is the prepared answer relating to a particular area of the syllabus. For example, a candidate may be tempted to prepare a general answer on directors’ duties where the question only asks about one specific duty.
  高顿网校温馨提醒
  为了方便各位学员能更加系统地掌握考试大纲的重点知识,帮助大家充分备考,体验实战,高顿网校开通了全免费的ACCA题库(包括精题真题和全真模考系统),题库里附有详细的答案解析,学员可以通过多种题型加强练习。戳这里进入ACCA免费题库>>>

微信扫一扫,关注ACCA*7资讯,满满的干货喂饱你!ACCA微信公众号:gaodunaccaACCA分享与交流QQ群:227573128 

acca备考 热门问题解答
acca考试怎么搭配科目?

建议优先选择相关联的科目进行搭配报考,这样可以提高备考效率,减轻备考压力,1、F1-F4:为随时机考科目,难度较低,这里可以自行随意选择考试顺序。2、F5-F9:如果你的工作的和财务会计或者审计有关、或者你比较擅长财务和审计的话,推荐先考F7和F8。你可以选择一起考ACCA考试科目F7和F8或者先考F7(8)再考F8(7),这就要取决你一次想考几门。3、P阶段:选修科目中,建议企业首选AFM!第二部分科目进行选择,如果AA和SBR掌握学生更好,可以通过选择AAA,如果SBL掌握的好,可以自己选择APM。

acca一共几门几年考完?

acca一共有15门考试科目,其中有必修科目和选修科目,考生需要考完13门科目才能拿下证书。

acca一年考几次?

acca一年有4次考试,分别是3月、6月、9月和12月,分季机考科目是采取的这类四个考季的模式,而随时机考则是没有这方面的时间规定限制,可以随报随考。

acca的含金量如何?

ACCA证书的含金量是比较高的,从就业、能力提升、全球认可等角度来说,都是比较有优势的证书,其含金量主要表现在以下几个方面:1、国际化,认可度高;2、岗位多,就业前景好;3、缺口大,人才激励。

在线提问
严选名师 全流程服务

Sdanvi

高顿ACCA全学科负责人

教学特色
自创“少女三大法则”和“二阶学习法”
教学资历
两年内高分通过ACCA考试,ACCA业界学霸型讲师
客户评价
帮助学生快速理解ACCA的知识点,是ACCA学习不可错过的宝藏博主
sdanvi
  • 老师好,考出ACCA的难度相当于考进什么大学?
  • 老师好,ACCA考试怎样备考(越详细越好)?
  • 老师好,38岁才开始考ACCA会不会太迟?
  • 老师好,ACCA通过率是多少?
  • 老师好,有了ACCA证后好找工作吗?
999+人提问

Perry

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
复旦-麻省理工国际工商管理硕士
教学资历
曾就职于四大、世界500强
客户评价
ACCA业界学霸型讲师
Perry
  • 老师好,acca如果不去考会怎么样?
  • 老师好,acca难度有多大?
  • 老师好,acca一年可以考多少门?
  • 老师好,acca考试科目几年考完?
  • 老师好,acca工资一般是多少钱?
999+人提问

Dora

高顿acca明星讲师

学历背景
英国布里斯托优秀硕士生
教学资历
多年普华永道金融组审计师经验
客户评价
知性又美丽,温柔大姐姐
Dora
  • 老师好,acca持证工资待遇如何?
  • 老师好,35岁考acca有意义吗?
  • 老师好,考过acca能干嘛?
  • 老师好,考完acca可以做什么工作?
  • 老师好,acca年薪一般多少?
999+人提问

高顿教育 > ACCA > 考试辅导