USCPA财务报告执行委员会对租赁方案的权衡(英文)

来源: 高顿网校 2014-08-20
  USCPA财务报告执行委员会 (The American Institute of CPAs' Financial Reporting Executive Committee) 刚刚向财务会计准则委员会和国际会计准则委员会提交了一份意见函,信函的内容建议对*7的租赁会计准则方案做修改。
  原文:
  The American Institute of CPAs’ Financial Reporting Executive Committee has submitted a comment letter to the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board suggesting changes in the latest proposals for lease accounting standards.
  Richard Paul, who chairs the USCPA’s FinREC panel, and Chad Soares, chairman of the FinREC Leases Task Force, said they support the FASB and IASB goal of putting long-term leases on the balance sheet, but suggested in Monday’s comment letter that the classification tests to distinguish so-called Type A leases from Type B leases in the latest exposure draft should be simpler.
  They acknowledged the criticisms that FASB and the IASB made back in 2009 about the current leasing standards, for example, that many leases are off-balance sheet despite the fact that financial statement users believe they give rise to assets and liabilities that should be recognized in the financial statements of lessees, forcing users to adjust the reported amounts in the financial statements in connection with those transactions. There are also two widely varying accounting models for leases, allowing similar transactions to be accounted for differently, further reducing comparability for users. In addition, the existing lease accounting standards provide transaction structuring opportunities that make the financial statements less transparent for users.
  “A cornerstone of the response to these criticisms is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities arising from a lease,” the FinREC officials wrote. “We agree with this core principle and with the notion that many leases inherently include a financing component that justifies the recognition of a liability by the lessee, and the conceptual merit of recognizing the associated rights conveyed in exchange for assuming the liability. However, FinREC is concerned that other important objectives have not been met and that the overall standard is not a sufficient improvement over today’s guidance to support adoption of the proposals in the [exposure draft]. We are also concerned that adoption of the provisions of the ED will impose significant costs on financial statement preparers—both on transition and on an ongoing basis.”
  They acknowledged that some of those costs represent the investment in new accounting systems and the associated controls that could ease the financial reporting burdens once they are implemented. “However, the complexity inherent in the construct of the dual model, specifically the distinction based on whether the leased item is property, and the ongoing required judgments, represent a permanent increased level of effort,” they added. “A lease accounting model that is general enough to consider all the various types of leasing arrangements and provides a single recognition and measurement approach has proven to be a challenge. As such, we understand why the ED proposes a dual model; however, the dual model as currently proposed is not sufficiently operational and does not incrementally improve financial reporting in a cost-effective manner.”
  Paul and Soares added that, in formulating a final standard, the standard-setters should give greater consideration to the cost versus the benefit, including performing additional field tests of any new standards and evaluating how to strike a better balance between the technical and operational aspects of any proposed changes to leasing. “FinREC believes that any transition to a model with most leases on balance sheet will by necessity involve a significant level of effort,” they added. “However, it would appear that additional accommodations with respect to classification, transition and remeasurement … would reduce the cost without sacrificing transparency objectives of this project.”

 USCPA官方微信
扫一扫微信,*9时间获取USCPA考试时间提醒,体验全新备考方式
 
高顿网校特别提醒:已经报名2014年USCPA 考试的考生可按照复习计划有效进行!另外,高顿网校2013年USCPA考试辅导高清课程已经开通,通过针对性地讲解、训练、答疑、模考,对学习过程进行全程跟踪、分析、指导,可以帮助考生全面提升备考效果。
 
  报考指南:2014年USCPA报考指南 
  考前冲刺:USCPA 考试试题   考试辅导
  高清网课:USCPA网络课程
 
USCPA备考 热门问题解答
美国注会考试考多少分及格?

uscpa一共有四门科目,每门考试的满分为99分,75分及格,但是这个75不是75%的正确率,不能被理解为百分比。

uscpa一共几门几年考完?

uscpa总共考4门,一般单科成绩的有效期为18个月,大家需要在这个有效期的时间内,通过剩余的三门科目,否则第一门通过的考试成绩就作废,需要重考。因此,uscpa考试周期最长为18个月。

uscpa一年能考几次?

NASBA和AICPA开启了连续测试期后,大家可以不受限制的全年参加uscpa考试。在uscpa的考试成绩公布后,如果大家发现自己没有通过考试,能够马上申请并参加该门科目考试,也不用再等待下一个考季才能申请重考。

uscpa的含金量如何?

uscpa是美国正式的注册会计师国家资格,在美国拥有审计签字权,作为美国财经领域的三大黄金证书之一,在国内外都有着很好的知名度。很多外企招聘财务经理或财务总监岗位,都将持有uscpa证书作为优先录用条件。

在线提问
严选名师 全流程服务

Feifei

高顿USCPA研究院院长

学历背景
美国纽约市立大学会计本科&硕士
教学资历
高顿USCPA研究院院长、USCPA中国校友会副会长、高顿考前冲刺营人气教练、1对1考前辅导教练
客户评价
专业度高,擅长规划,富有亲和力
Feifei
  • 老师好,考出美国注册会计师的难度相当于考进什么大学?
  • 老师好,美国注会考试怎样备考(越详细越好)?
  • 老师好,38岁才开始考美国注册会计师会不会太迟?
  • 老师好,美国注册会计师通过率是多少?
  • 老师好,有了美国注册会计师证后好找工作吗?
999+人提问

Zhou

高顿USCPA明星讲师

学历背景
管理学博士
教学资历
南京审计大学审计硕士研究生导师、现任南京审计大学内审计教育项目主任、10年以上教学研究经验
客户评价
教学严谨,思路清晰,细心负责
Zhou
  • 老师好,uscpa如果不去考会怎么样?
  • 老师好,美国注册会计师难度有多大?
  • 老师好,uscpa考了对移民留学有优势吗?
  • 老师好,美国注册会计师考试科目几年考完?
  • 老师好,uscpa工资一般是多少钱?
999+人提问

Jin

高顿USCPA明星讲师

学历背景
加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学会计硕士
教学资历
美国注册会计师、纳斯达克上市企业CFO、十多年北美学习及工作经验,是高顿知名讲师
客户评价
课程讲授幽默风趣,深入浅出,引人入胜
Jin
  • 老师好,美国注册会计师工资待遇如何?
  • 老师好,35岁考美国注册会计师有意义吗?
  • 老师好,考过美国注册会计师能干嘛?
  • 老师好,考完美国注册会计师可以做什么工作?
  • 老师好,uscpa美国注册会计师年薪一般多少?
999+人提问

Lai

高顿USCPA研究院人气讲师

学历背景
美国德州A&M大学会计硕士
教学资历
USCPA&CMA双证持证人、国内USCPA考试满分记录保持者,现任Deloitte事务所高级税务,是高顿知名讲师
客户评价
通俗易懂,逻辑分析力强,对考点把握十分精准
Lai
  • 老师好,uscpa证书一年挣多少钱?
  • 老师好,美国注册会计师能干什么工作?
  • 老师好,uacpa自学过的概率大吗?
  • 老师好,美国注会一共几科几年过?
  • 老师好,uscpa考下来大概费用多少?
999+人提问

高顿教育 > USCPA > 考试动态